Ted Cruz is the darling of conservatives. He talks tough and he does not mind stepping on toes, even the toes of members of his own party. Yesterday he spoke about three of the last GOP presidential contenders. He spoke sarcastically about President Dole, President McCain and President Romney. McCain said he could take the insults, but Bob Dole should be off limits. Ninety year old Dole fought valiantly in World War II and sustained injuries that have effected his entire life. It takes a special kind of person to hurl an insert at Dole, and that special person is Cruz who can talk about patriotism, but obviously he can’t recognize a real patriot when he sees one.
Tag Archives: gop
Martin Bashir has resigned for making inappropriate remarks concerning Sarah Palin. His remarks were simply wrong and he has lost his job over his own poor judgment, but how did he know he had gone too far? Everyday we hear people speak coursely. We hear people use profanity in any situation. A few days ago I saw a story where a bus driver had called the police to help her correct the behavior of some unruly middle school students. The police arrived on the scene and they proceeded to berate the students and along the way they dropped a few F-Bombs. They were called to correct bad behavior and they end up bringing more bad behavior to the situation. the children’s parents were upset and the police were disciplined, but I wonder did the parents go a step further and question what were the students doing that called for police intervention? What were they saying? How were they acting? Have you watched any sitcoms lately? Everything is a joke and most of it is profane, but who determines if they have gone too far or even crossed a line? Since 2007 we have seen depictions of the president that range from gorrilla to witch doctor. He has had his citizenship questioned, his marriage questioned even his sexuality questioned, but did that cross the line? Who determines when a line has been crossed? Do lies cross the line? Does racism qualify as a line crosser? Don’t get me wrong Bashir should have lost his job. His statements were gross and unforgivable, but what made him feel that his depiction was acceptable. The day he made the statement I am sure he did not say this is the day I will put my job in jeopardy. He probably thought himself clever and thought that he would be applauded not booed and never reprimanded, but that’s what happened. Sarah Palin canceled a scheduled interview with NBC, Joe Scarborough went balistic and his colleagues at MSNBC were forced to answer questions about the statements while doing interviews that had nothing to do with Bashir. MSNBC fired Alec Baldwin over a gay slur so how could they keep Bashir on after he advocated force feeding Palin defecation. He went too far and the sad thing is people don’t know what too far looks like until they arrive there.
Martin Bashir insults Sarah Palin and he apologizes–Alec Baldwin’s gay slur gets him canned…is this a double standard?
MSNBC has canceled Alec Baldwin’s show. Baldwin alledgedly uttered a gay slur. Baldwin denies it but he was fired. Martin Bashir responded to Sarah Palin’s slave remarks by suggesting that she experience having someone defecate and urinate on her. Bashir has apologized, but he did not lose his job over his reckless remarks. In the headline I pose the question does MSNBC have a double standard? I know the answer they do. MSNBC is gay friendly and a number of their hosts are gay, but even though MSNBC is not a conservative haven does that mean the hosts can say anything and only have to offer an apology? Share your thoughts.
Guest Blogger: Sam Fulwood III
In almost every discussion of race in this countrywhether private conversations among friends and family or public debates between political antagoniststhose engaged tend to talk past one another. Passions often displace reason; facts disappear like smoke in the wind, blown aside in the rhetoric of extreme beliefs. Who among us, having lived any appreciable time in the United States, lacks an awareness of our nations intractable racial frictions? And, after rubbing against the rough edges, who eschews the seemingly hard-wired opinions shared by peers of the racial others? Ripped from the recent headlines, an example is the gag reflex kerfuffle kicked up by The Washington Posts Richard Cohen, who included a passing line in a column that suggested that some white people want to throw up at the sight of an interracial family such as the one of New York City Mayor-elect Bill de Blasio. Judging by my personal and extensive conversations, a good number of black people consider such comments as a fool-proof indication of white racism. To them, its a short walk from the Tea Party to a Republican caucus to a guy with a pickup truck sporting Confederate flags to a conclave of the Ku Klux Klan. To them, theyre all fungible identifiers of resurgent white supremacy. I appreciate where theyre coming from, given this nations racial history. Black Americans have long, painful memories. The rise of white nationalism is nothing new to those who remember or have closely studied American history. Roughly a century ago, in the shadow of the Reconstruction Era, racist, white politicians such as Benjamin Ryan Tillman Jr., the governor of South Carolina and U.S. senator at the turn of the 20th century, appealed to the lost masculinity of white men after the Civil War and the immediate political empowerment of former black slaves to reimpose white supremacy across the South. In his 2000 book, Ben Tillman and the Reconstruction of White Supremacy, Stephen Kantrowitz, an American history professor at the University of Wisconsin, Madison, describes Tillmans role in the Hamburg Riot on July 8, 1876, which resulted in the cold-blooded murder of black militiamen who paraded through Hamburg, South Carolina, to celebrate Independence Day. Kantrowitz points out how Pitchfork Benso named because he went to Washington, D.C., with the promise to stick a pitchfork in that bag of beef Grover Clevelandrose to political celebrity by supporting the lynching and mass murder of black people and appealing to rural, white men of the South to reclaim what they had lost through emancipation and the experience of Reconstruction: their sense of independent, unfettered manhood. Is history repeating itself? I dont think so. Moreover, I fear some African Americans who suspect the worst of all whites are succumbing to the same trap that befuddles those narrow-minded white Americans who tend to think of African Americans as all the same. Indeed, an increasing number of studies are revealing that, like the wide ranges of political and social thought among African Americans, all white folks arent of a single mind about race in America. Charles Blow, a perceptive op-ed writer for The New York Times, captured this dilemma perfectly: There are different perceptions of racial realities. What some see as slights, others see as innocent opposition. But there are some objective truths here. Racism is a virus that is growing clever at avoiding detection. Race consciousness is real. Racial assumptions and prejudices are real. And racism is real. But these realities can operate without articulation and beneath awareness. For those reasons, some can see racism where it is absent, and others can willfully ignore any possibility that it could ever be present. Unpacking all this is hard work, too hard for many Americans who, as Blow describes some of them, have simple understandings of complex concepts. Yet the evidence is out there for those who dig deep to find it. A case in point is Angry White Men: American Masculinity at the End of an Era, a recently published book by Stony Brook University sociology professor Michael Kimmel.
Kimmel has made quite a name for himself in gender studies circles by focusing on white-male masculinity issues instead of the more common feminist theories. His new book attempts to explain why downwardly mobile white men are so angry and prone toward far-right views that lead to hate, violence, and suicide. In an extensive excerpt of the book, posted at Salon.com, Kimmel draws bright line distinctions among white Americans. He argues that they are not a racist monolith: On the extreme Right, by contrast, race is a proxy for class. Among the white supremacists, when they speak of race consciousness, defending white people, protesting for equal rights for white people, they actually dont mean all white people. They dont mean Wall Street bankers and lawyers, though they are pretty much entirely white and male. They dont mean white male doctors, or lawyers, or architects, or even engineers. They dont mean the legions of young white hipster guys, or computer geeks flocking to the Silicon Valley, or the legions of white preppies in their boat shoes and seersucker jackets interning at white-shoe law firms in major cities. Not at all. They mean middle-and working-class white people. Race consciousness is actually class consciousness without actually having to see class. Race blindness leads working-class people to turn right; if they did see class, theyd turn left and make common cause with different races in the same economic class. Where Kimmel dives deep into the psyche of angry, white men, my colleague and Center for American Progress Senior Fellow John Halpin takes an empirical plunge, beyond anecdotal, into nearby waters. Writing on ThinkProgress earlier this week, Halpin makes the convincing argument that there is really not such thing as white opinion anymore. Drawing from a poll conducted for the recent CAP/PolicyLink study, Building an All-In Nation, Halpin notes that the results should be studied more, but the conclusions are nonetheless striking. White liberals think far more like the bulk of African-Americans, Latinos and Asians than white conservatives on the countrys biggest ideological questions. Thats particularly true on diversity questions.Perhaps, our collective attention might be better served on those disaffected whites that dont buy into the extremist, far-right ideology of white supremacy. They are ripe for conversion about progressive political thought, if the serious effort is made to demonstrate common cause with the growing empowerment of racial and ethnic minority Americans. To be sure, the hardcore racists that Kimmel describes so well are, as Halpin acutely observes, a significant if declining bloc of voters, [and] the real outliers on issues of race in America. They are a dying breed, soon to be as dead as old Pitchfork Ben and his brand of racist politics. This is the significant fact to keep firmly in mind because it points us all toward the hopeful, progressive direction of our nations future.
Sam Fulwood III is a Senior Fellow at the Center for American Progress and Director of the CAP Leadership Institute. His work with the Centers Progress 2050 project examines the impact of policies on the nation when there will be no clear racial or ethnic majority by the year 2050.###
Group Calls for the Washington Post to Fire Columnist Richard Cohen Over Remarks on Interracial Marriage
FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE:
Tuesday, 12 November 2013
Brett Abrams : 516-841-1105 : firstname.lastname@example.org
Outrage After Washington Post Columnist “Represses Gag Reflex” Discussing NYC Mayor de Blasio’s Interracial Marriage
Statement by Nita Chaudhary, co-founder of UltraViolet, a national women’s organization, in reaction to Washington Post writer Richard Cohen’s column today, in which he “represses a gag reflex” while talking about NYC Mayor Bill de Blasio’s interracial marriage and family:
“Richard Cohen is begging to be fired, and the Washington Post needs to do the right thing and cut him loose. Not only has he blamed twerking for America’s rape epidemic and justified racial profiling that led to the murder of Travyon Martin, but now he is telling America that interracial marriages make him and other people gag. If it wasn’t clear before, it is clear now: Richard Cohen is off the rails and a growing stain on the Washington Post’s reputation. He needs to go.”
Earlier this year, more than 2,000 members of UltraViolet penned letters to the Washington Post urging the paper to drop Cohen over a series of comments he made in the wake of the Steubenville rape investigation and case. Nita Chaudhary, co-founder of UltraViolet, is married to a man of another race.
FOR MORE INFORMATION: http://gawker.com/richard-cohen-has-written-something-insane-about-interr-1462871988
For interviews with Nita Chaudhary, or UltraViolet, please contact Brett Abrams at 516-841-1105 or by email at email@example.com.
# # # # #
UltraViolet is an online community of over 500,000 women and men who want to take collective action to expose and fight sexism in the public sector, private sector and the media. Find out more at WeAreUltraViolet.org
Read the linked story and share your thoughts.
Read the linked story and share your thoughts: http://www.albanytribune.com/23102013-jenny-mccarthys-crack-up-oped42349/
The widow of Rep. Bill Young, Beverly Young has sent a note to former Florida Gov. Charlie Crist a note telling him that he will not be welcome at the memorial service for her late husband. she has also advised other local politicians that their presence will also be unwelcome. What do you think, and would you ever consider leaving this type of directive for your relatives to follow?
Watch the clip and share your thoughts.