CNN Piers Morgan versus Alex Jones…who won the argument?

Watch the clip and share your thoughts.

About these ads
Both comments and trackbacks are currently closed.

Comments

  • Spanish Inquisitor  On January 9, 2013 at 3:38 pm

    What argument? That was a monologue….

  • Bill  On January 9, 2013 at 8:21 pm

    There is no argument here. An argument requires at least two opposing points of view presented and supported by facts, data or statistics. Piers Morgan was ill equipped with any of those because the one statistic that he offered was erroneous. He insisted that there were thirty five murders reported in the most recent available data for Great Britain but there were actually fifty nine.

    To accurately get a true context of any situation, more than one isolated data point is required. Below is a broad based presentation of data which provides greater context and accuracy provides a truer picture of the use of guns in the commission of crimes.

    http://www.fox19.com/story/20538164/piers-morgan-vs-alex-jones-and-gun-homicide-rates

  • pierre  On January 10, 2013 at 8:01 am

    No winners here. It was clear that Alex Jones was not interested in a discussion of the issue. His behavior was embarrassing.

  • Okey  On January 14, 2013 at 7:40 pm

    WATCHING THIS FROM NIGERIA, I HAVE NO DOUBT COMING TO THE INESCAPABLE CONCLUSION THAT ALEX JONES AND MOST OF HIS COMPATRIOTS ARE LUNATICS WHILE THE MANY ARE ON THE FRINGE OF INSANITY. THAT SOME HUMAN BEING CAN, AFTER “NEWTOWN” ADVANCE THIS SILLY ARGUMENT AS DID ALEX JONES IS VERY BAFFLING.

Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.

Join 414 other followers

%d bloggers like this: