Earlier today one of my frequent commenters sent this clip to me. I intially did not post it but I finally did. A little while ago I was on Twitter and learned that this clip is on the front page of the Drudge Report. i wonder why? No, I don’t wonder. She fits the profile of the Romney 47%. You know the ones that are waiting on the government to answer their every need. As she exclaims she got a phone from Obama so he’s got her vote. I just wonder did she know her rant would make her the darling of he right? Is she acting? Was this a set up? No, that would be dirty politics, and everyone knows the party of Watergate would do that. Share your thoughts.
-
Live Feed
Comments
Shame on you. Throw this woman under the bus with a cheap shot by calling her a toothless woman. Look very closely and you’ll see that there are no visible vacancies in her mouth. But even if she were completely edentulate that does not discredit her. She is much like that least favorite child who we still have to accept as a member of the family or that family member who we hope won’t be at home when our guests come to visit.
It is very curious that you report that she received a phone call from the president. She really doesn’t look like someone who would appear on the president’s “calls to make today list.” But that could be connected with what I subsequently learned. It turns out that she was part of an organized group of people who were bussed to the Romney rally to protest. I wonder who organized and paid for that transportation.
Remember, Drudge is a news aggregator, not a reporting agency. This story could have been culled from any one of many reporting agencies that carried it. I hope you were not attempting to create a negative bias about this story by tying it to Drudge. As a matter of fact, that is not where I saw the story.
So basically are choices are choose the candidate from the party that would buy a vote or the candidate from the party that would suppress the vote. Incidentally the free phone program was instituted under the Bush administration but that info may not filter to the so called low information voter.
Regardless of who started the phone giveaway, she thinks it was from Obama, and she’s voting for him because of it. Surely you’re not implying that if she knew it came from Bush (allegedly), she would vote for Romney and say that Obama “Sucks!” as she so eloquently stated?
So she votes for him cause she thinks the phone came from President Obama, take a step back. What’s your point? There are people who will vote for Romney cause they believe he was instrumental in getting bin Laden. People will vote for all kinds of reasons; as long as they are legally eligible, it’s neither here nor there.
“Darling of the Right”? No, Exhibit A of a people that the Left insist do not exist, and that Romney rightfully said he cannot convince to consider him. Earlier you shared a video the Democratic Party is using to say “they care”. Did they have people like this woman in the video? No, it would have made Romney’s point. This is just balance. And if you have to compare the two, at least the Drudge feed was done by Drudge and not the Republicans. The “we care” video was direct pandering from the Party of Watergate.
Toosharp, could you post a link here to any story that offers evidence of individuals declaring they will vote for Romney because he was instrumental in getting Bin Ladin? I haven’t seen that anywhere.