The Gawker.com published a story from an anonymous source claiming to have had a one night stand with Christine O’Donnell. “The piece, entitled I Had a One Night Stand with Christine O’Donnell, was published on the site on Thursday, and concerned the events of an evening three years ago, when the author claimed O’Donnell, an acquaintance, had turned up at his home in Philadelphia and asked if she could change into her Halloween outfit – a ladybird. After persuading the unnamed author and his roomate to accompany her for drinks, O’Donnell had reportedly stayed the night in the man’s bed, though they had not had sex. (The man has since, perhaps inevitably, been named by a number of websites).”* The Gawker has been denounced for printing the piece by both liberals and conservatives. The story should have never been printed but we are now living in a time when sensational sells and the more sensational the more sales. The more sensational on a website and the more hits and clicks come to your site. No one seems to care if reputations are destroyed that’s simply collateral damage. So often I have heard people say that conservative women are subjected to much harsher treatment. I never gave it much credence until this week. If O’Donnell was a Democrat would they have printed the piece? Would there have been more public outcry regarding Joy Behar’s bitch comment it Sharron Angle were a progressive? Two things I know: I do not agree with either of these women on policy issues, but as a woman I am offended by the treatment they are receiving by the media.